Building a ‘think-&-do’ tank for Cultural Devolution

Project Background

In 2026, Culture Commons secured culture as an eighth area of competence within the UK Government’s flagship English Devolution & Community Empowerment Act.

“By including culture as a new area of competence, the Government is sending a clear signal of the role that strategic authorities can and should continue to play in supporting cultural initiatives, as well as recognising the important role that culture - in its many forms - plays in enriching our collective lives and supporting local economic growth.”

Miatta Fahnbulleh MP - Minister for Devolution, Faith & Communities

The Plan

For the first time ever, regional leaders and communities will have a legislatively backed mandate to act in the interests of the creative, cultural and heritage life of their areas.

This represents one of the most significant shifts in cultural policy in a generation and implications for the creative, cultural and heritage sectors and local communities could be considerable.

This important change stems from a national programme of research and open policy development led by Culture Commons and 30 partners throughout 2025-25 – The Future of Cultural Devolution in the UK.

The opportunity on the table now is to help shape how the new competence for culture is brought to life to support regional governance, investment and public policy. 

So, we’re convening a consortium of places, sector bodies and research institutions to develop an independent think-and-do tank dedicated to cultural devolution.

Impact to date

We’ve already had real-world impact

Secured ‘culture’ as a formal power within the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, strengthening our sectors place at the table.

Influenced national housing policy through the New Towns Taskforce, embedding minimum levels of cultural infrastructure for the future of new communities.

Informed Baroness Margaret Hodge’s much anticipated review of Arts Council England, helping to shape the future role of arm’s-length bodies.

Contributed to DCMS’s Culture & Heritage Capitals programme, recalibrating the way cultural investments are valued within HM Treasury’s Green Book methodology.

Supported mayoral combined authorities to shape and secure enhanced devolution plans for culture, opening an additional layer of advocacy for our sectors.

Part of a consortium of partners developing a blueprint for a National Cultural Data Observatory, which will support data-informed devolved cultural decision making.

We’re inviting a range of stakeholders from right across the creative, cultural and heritage ecosystem to join us:

Strategic authorities will gain a more structured programme to help explore new cultural powers with confidence, align culture with wider policy priorities and be part of a shared platform for collective national advocacy on issues of shared interest.

Local authorities will be able to play a defining role in shaping new sub-regional approaches, ensuring that local delivery, assets and expertise are reflected in how devolved systems operate.

Research institutions will contribute to the growing evidence base underpinning cultural devolution, bringing methodological expertise, analytical capacity and independent insight to support evidence-led policy design, testing and evaluation.

Sub-sector representatives will be able to influence how devolved policy develops in practice, reducing fragmentation and strengthening their own national networks and infrastructures they rely on.

Arm’s-length bodies, funders and support organisations will be able to shape how investment frameworks, expertise and national infrastructure align with evolving place-based leadership whilst helping areas to maintain the arm’s length principle.

Proposed work strands

The objectives

  • An independent platform where researchers, policymakers, places and the wider cultural ecosystem can work together on live public policy challenges as they emerge – connecting evidence, implementation and influence.

  • Develop practical solutions, test new models and generate early wins that help new powers work effectively for communities, places and the sector – particularly for those parts of the ecosystem that are under-supported.

  • Use existing knowledge more strategically, while generating new applied and place-based research where needed, to strengthen the pathway from research, to policy, to delivery.

  • Reduce duplication, support collaboration across institutions and help prevent cultural devolution becoming uneven or siloed as it develops.

  • Bring together strategic authorities, local government, sub-sector leaders, the workforce, communities and national institutions to surface shared needs and shape policy at the national level.

  • Provide trusted convening, shared problem-solving and open-access outputs designed to strengthen the wider ecosystem – not merely generate proprietary consultancy products!

  • A space where evidence, experimentation and partnership can help shape how cultural devolution develops – while there is still time to influence it.

Why now?

  • England possesses extraordinary creative, cultural and heritage assets, but lacks a coherent system capable of aligning national ambition with local delivery across the wider creative industries and cultural ecosystem. Fragmentation across institutions, funding streams and decision-making continues to limit strategic coordination and long-term impact.

    Under-resourced local authorities and sector bodies increasingly carry responsibility for sustaining this ecosystem, despite lacking the powers, capacity and investment needed to shape it effectively. As devolution accelerates, roles and accountabilities across national, regional and local institutions are becoming increasingly blurred.

    A more integrated framework is needed - one that recognises the interdependence of the creative industries, the cultural sector and heritage, while clarifying responsibilities and better aligning policy, funding and decision-making across the system as a whole.

  • England’s creative industries, cultural sector and heritage ecosystem require a shift from fragmented governance towards a clearer multi-level system, with stronger alignment between national, regional and local responsibilities. As devolution accelerates, accountability must be matched by meaningful decision-making powers and the resources needed to exercise them effectively.

    In some areas, policy and funding approaches may need to move away from short-term, competitive models towards longer-term, place-based investment that supports local capacity, strategic planning and sustainable growth across the wider ecosystem. Sub-sector leaders and the public must also be better equipped to seize the opportunities presented by devolution and be at the table to shape emerging policy frameworks.

    This will require stronger national data and evidence infrastructure that moves across spatial scales to support monitoring, evaluation and shared learning, enabling more coordinated decision-making across the creative industries, culture and heritage sectors.

  • Public investment in the creative industries, culture and heritage is too often diluted by short-term funding cycles and fragmented delivery mechanisms, limiting the sector’s ability to plan strategically or achieve lasting impact. Rather than reducing regional disparities, current approaches could reinforce place inequalities by rewarding areas with existing capacity while leaving others behind.

    At the same time, the contribution of culture to economic growth, health, wellbeing and place-making remains underleveraged across wider public policy. As devolution progresses, there is a risk that sub-sectors reliant on national or pan-regional infrastructure could become increasingly overlooked within locally driven frameworks.

    This is not simply a cultural policy challenge, but a systems challenge - requiring better coordination between governance, investment, infrastructure and evidence across the wider creative and cultural ecosystem.

  • Devolution, integrated settlements and Local Government Reorganisation are rapidly reshaping England’s governance landscape, creating a rare window in which the future relationship between national and local cultural leadership can still be meaningfully influenced. New powers, institutions and investment mechanisms present significant opportunities for the creative industries, cultural sector and heritage ecosystem - but only if policy development is grounded in evidence and informed by the realities of delivery across the system.

    The governance environment remains fluid enough to shape, as recent progress on cultural competency within devolution policy has already demonstrated. However, that window is narrowing. Without strategic intervention, temporary devolution workarounds risk becoming permanently embedded structures, reinforcing fragmentation and uneven capacity for years to come.

The Evidence Base

Always evidence-informed…

In 2024, Culture Commons launched The Future of Cultural Devolution in the UK.

This year-long programme of research, insight gathering and open policy development brought together 30 core partners, six universities, 25 researchers, over 250 cultural organisations, the creative workforce (including freelancers) and the public.

Together we developed research projects on a range of key strategic questions related to cultural devolution. The findings represent the largest evidence base on cultural devolution assembled anywhere in the world.

We used it to rigorously assess the risks and opportunities of deepening and widening cultural devolution across the UK. It was used to underpin the development of a suite of policy proposals for the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act.

Project Publications

Get In Touch

If you or your organisation would like to come and be part of the think-&-do tank, please get in touch with us at contact@culturecommons.uk